Book Image

DevOps for Networking

By : Steven Armstrong
Book Image

DevOps for Networking

By: Steven Armstrong

Overview of this book

Frustrated that your company’s network changes are still a manual set of activities that slow developers down? It doesn’t need to be that way any longer, as this book will help your company and network teams embrace DevOps and continuous delivery approaches, enabling them to automate all network functions. This book aims to show readers network automation processes they could implement in their organizations. It will teach you the fundamentals of DevOps in networking and how to improve DevOps processes and workflows by providing automation in your network. You will be exposed to various networking strategies that are stopping your organization from scaling new projects quickly. You will see how SDN and APIs are influencing DevOps transformations, which will in turn help you improve the scalability and efficiency of your organizations networks operations. You will also find out how to leverage various configuration management tools such as Ansible, to automate your network. The book will also look at containers and the impact they are having on networking as well as looking at how automation impacts network security in a software-defined network.
Table of Contents (19 chapters)
DevOps for Networking
Credits
About the Author
Acknowledgments
About the Reviewer
www.PacktPub.com
Preface
Index

Preface

The title of this book is "DevOps For Networking". DevOps, as you are probably well-aware, is an abbreviated amalgamation of "Development" and "Operations", so why does it have any significance to networking? It is true that there is no "Net" in the DevOps name, though it is fair to say that the remit of DevOps has extended well beyond its initial goal.

The initial DevOps movement sought to remove the "chucking it over the fence" and reactive mentality that existed between development and operations teams, but DevOps can be efficiently used to promote collaboration between all teams in IT, not just Development and Operations staff.

DevOps, as a concept, initially aimed to solve the scenario where developers would develop code, make significant architectural changes, and not consider the Operations team that needed to deploy the code to production. So when the time came for the operations team to deploy the developers' code changes to production, this would result in a broken deployment, meaning crucial software fixes or new products would not reach customers as planned, and the deployment process would typically take days or weeks to fix.

This led to frustration to all the teams involved, as developers would have to stop coding new features and instead would have to help operations staff fix the deployment process. Operations teams would also be frustrated, as often they would not have been told that infrastructure changes were required to deploy the new release to production. As a result, the operations team did not have the idea to adequately prepare the production environment to support the architectural changes.

This common IT scenario highlights the broken process and operational model that would happen continually and cause friction between development and operations teams.

"DevOps" was an initiative setup to foster an environment of collaboration and communication between these previously conflicting teams. It promotes teams to speak daily, making each other aware of changes and consequently preventing avoidable situations from happening. So, it just so happens that development and operations staff were the first set of silos that DevOps aimed to solve. Consequently, it branded DevOps as a way to unify the teams to work, as one consolidated fluid function, but it could easily have been called something else.

DevOps aims to create better working relationships between teams and a happier working environment, as frankly nobody enjoys conflict or firefighting preventable issues on a daily basis. It also aims to share knowledge between teams to prevent the development teams being viewed as "ignorant to infrastructure" and operations teams to be "blockers to changes" and "slowing down devs". These are the common misconceptions that teams working in silos have of one another when they don't take the time to understand each other's goals.

DevOps strives to build an office environment where teams appreciate other teams and their aims, and they are respectful of their common goals. DevOps is undoubtedly one most talked about topics in the IT industry today. It is not a coincidence that its popularity has risen with the emergence of agile software development, as an alternative to using the more traditional waterfall approach.

Waterfall development and the "V-Model" encompass the separate phases of analysis, design, implementation (coding), and testing. These phases are split up traditionally into different isolated teams, with formalized project hand-off dates that are set in stone.

Agile was born out of the realization that in the fast-paced software industry, long running projects were suboptimal and not the best way of delivering real value to customers. As a result, agile has moved projects to shorter iteration cycles that incorporated analysis, design, implementation, and testing into two-week cycles (sprints) and aimed at using a prototyping approach instead.

The prototyping approach uses the notion of incremental development, which has allowed companies to gather feedback on products earlier in the release cycle, rather than utilizing a big bang approach that delivered the full solution in one big chunk at the end of the implementation phase.

Delivering projects in a waterfall fashion at the end of the waterfall implementation stage ran the risk of delivering products that customers did not want or where developers had misinterpreted requirements. These issues were typically only discovered in the final test phase when the project was ready to be taken to market. This often resulted in projects being deemed a failure or resulting in huge delays, whereas costly rework and change requests could be actioned.

Agile software development for the best part has fostered the need to collapse down those team silos that were typically associated with waterfall software development, and this strengthened the need for daily collaboration.

With the introduction of agile software development, it also has changed the way software testing is carried out too, with the same DevOps principles also being applied to testing functions.

Quality assurance test teams can no longer afford to be reactive either, much like operations teams before them. So, this promoted the need for test teams to work more efficiently and not delay products reaching market. This, however, could not be done at the expense of the product, so they needed to find a way to make sure applications are tested adequately and pass all quality assurance checks while working in a smarter way.

It was readily accepted that quality assurance test teams can no longer operate in silos separate from development teams; instead, agile software development has promoted test cases being written in parallel to the software development, so they are not a separate activity. This is in stark contrast to code being deployed into a test environment and left to a team of testers to execute manual tests or run a set of test packs where they deal with issues reactively.

Agile has promoted developers and quality assurance testers to instead work together in scrum teams on a daily basis to test software before it is packaged for deployment, with those same tests then being maintained and kept up to date and used to seed the regression test packs.

This has been used to mitigate the friction caused by developers checking in code changes that break quality assurance test team's regression packs. With siloed test teams, a common scenario that would often cause friction is be that a graphical user interface (GUI) would suddenly be changed by a developer, resulting in a portion of regression tests breaking. This change would be done without notifying the test team. The tests would be failing because they were written for an old GUI and were suddenly outdated, as opposed to breaking because developers had actually introduced a software failure or a bug.

This reactive approach to testing did not build confidence in the validity of the test failures reported by automated test packs as they are not always conclusively down to a software failure, and this introduced unnecessary delays due to suboptimal IT structure.

Instead if the communication between development and test teams had been better, using the principles promoted by DevOps, then these delays and suboptimal ways of working can be avoided.

More recently, we have seen the emergence of DevSecOps that have looked at integrating security and compliance into the software delivery process, as opposed to being bolted on manual actions and separate reactive initiatives. DevSecOps has looked at using DevOps and agile philosophies and embraced the idea of embedding security engineers in scrum teams to make sure that security requirements are met at the point of inception.

This means that security and compliance can be integrated as automated phases in Continuous Delivery pipelines, to run security compliance checks on every software release, and not slow down the software development lifecycle for developers and generate the necessary feedback loops.

So networking teams can learn from DevOps methodologies too much like development, operations, quality assurance, and security teams. These teams have utilized agile processes to improve their interaction with the software development process and benefit from using feedback loops.

How many times have network engineers had no choice but to delay a software release, as network changes need to be implemented and have been done so inefficiently using ticket-based systems that are not aligned with the processes other departments use? How many times have manually implemented network changes broken production services? This isn't a criticism of network teams or the ability of network engineers; it's the realization that the operational model needs to change and they can.

What this book covers

This book will look at how networking changes can be made more efficient so as not to slow down the software development lifecycle. It will help outline strategies network engineers can adopt to automate network operations. We will focus on setting up network teams to succeed in an automation-driven environment, enabling the teams to work in a more collaborative fashion, and improve efficiency.

It will also show that network teams need to build new skills and learn configuration management tools such as Ansible to help them achieve this goal. The book will show the advantages that these tools bring, using the network modules they provide, and that they will help make automation easy and act as a self-starter guide.

We will focus on some of the cultural challenges that need to be overcome to influence and implement automation processes for network functions and convince network teams to make the most of networking APIs that are now provided by vendors can be trusted.

The book will discuss public and private clouds such as AWS and OpenStack, and ways they are used to provide networking to users. It will also discuss the emergence of software-defined networking solutions, such as Juniper Contrail, VMWare NSX, CISCO ACI, and focus on the Nokia Nuage VSP solution, which aims to make networking functions a self-service commodity.

The book will also highlight how continuous integration and delivery processes and deployment pipelines can be applied to govern network changes. It will also show ways that unit testing can be applied to automated network changes to integrate them with the software delivery lifecycle.

A detailed chapter overview for the book is detailed below:

Chapter 1, The Impact of Cloud on Networking, will discuss ways in which the emergence of AWS for public cloud and OpenStack for private cloud have changed the way developers want to consume networking. It will look at some of the networking services AWS and OpenStack provide out of the box and look at some of the networking features they provide. It will show examples of how these cloud platforms have made networking a commodity much like infrastructure.

Chapter 2, The Emergence of Software-defined Networking, will discuss how software-defined networking has emerged. It will look at the methodology and focus on some of the scaling benefits and features this provides over and above the out-of-the-box experience from AWS and OpenStack. It will illustrate how one of the market-leading SDN solutions, Nuage, applies these concepts and principles and discusses other SDN solutions on the market.

Chapter 3, Bringing DevOps to Network Operations, will detail the pros and cons of a top-down and bottom-up DevOps initiatives with regards to networking. It will give readers food for thought on some of the strategies that have been a success and which ones have typically failed. This chapter will help CTOs, senior managers, and engineers who are trying to initiate a DevOps model in their company's network department and outline some of the different strategies they could use to achieve the cultural changes they desire.

Chapter 4, Configuring Network Devices Using Ansible, will outline the benefits of using configuration management tools to install and push configuration to network devices and discuss some of the open source network modules available to do this at the moment and how they work. It will give some examples of process flows that could be adopted to maintain device configuration.

Chapter 5, Orchestrating Load Balancers Using Ansible, will describe the benefits of using Ansible to orchestrate load balancers and the approaches to roll new software releases into service without the need for downtime or manual intervention. It will give some examples of some process flows that could be adopted to allow orchestration of both immutable and static servers looking at the different load balancer technologies available.

Chapter 6, Orchestrating SDN Controllers Using Ansible, will outline the benefits of using Ansible to orchestrate SDN controllers. It will outline the benefits of software-defined networking and why it is paramount to automate the network functions that an SDN controller exposes. This includes setting ACL rules dynamically, which will allow network engineers to provide a Network as a Service (NaaS) allowing developers to self-service their networking needs. It will discuss deployment strategies such as blue green networks as well as exploring some of the process flows that could be used to implement a NaaS approach.

Chapter 7, Using Continuous Integration Builds for Network Configuration, will discuss moving to a model where network configuration is stored in source control management systems, so it is easily audited and versioned and changes can be rolled back.

It will look at workflows that can be used to set up network configuration CI builds using tools such as Jenkins and Git.

Chapter 8, Testing Network Changes, will outline the importance of using test environments to test network changes before applying them in production. It will explore some of the open source tooling available and walk through some of the test strategies that can be applied to make sure that network changes are thoroughly tested before applying them to production.

Chapter 9, Using Continuous Delivery Pipelines to Deploy Network Changes, will show readers how to use continuous integration and Continuous Delivery pipelines to deliver network changes to production and put them through associated test environments. It will give some examples of some process flows that could be adopted to deliver network changes to production and how they can easily sit alongside infrastructure and code changes in deployment pipelines.

Chapter 10, The Impact of Containers on Networking, dedicated container technologies such as Docker and container orchestration engines such as Kubernetes and Swarm are becoming more and more popular with companies that are moving to microservice architectures. As a result, this has changed networking requirements. This chapter will look at how containers operate and the impact they have had on networking.

Chapter 11, Securing the Network, will look at how this approach makes a security engineer's job of auditing the network easier. It will look at the possible attack vectors in a software-defined network and ways that security checks can be integrated into a DevOps model.

What you need for this book

This book assumes a medium level on networking knowledge, a basic level of Linux knowledge, a basic knowledge of cloud computing technologies, and a broad knowledge of IT. It is focusing primarily on particular process workflows that can be implemented rather than base technologies, so the ideas and content can be applied to any organization, no matter the technology that is used.

However, that being said, it could be beneficial to readers to access the following technologies when digesting some of the chapters' content:

Who this book is for


The target audience for this book is network engineers who want to automate the manual and repetitive parts of their job or developers or system admins who want to automate all network functions.

This book will also provide a good insight to CTOs or managers who want to understand ways in which they can make their network departments more agile and initiate real cultural change within their organizations.

The book will also aid casual readers who want to understand more about DevOps, continuous integration, and Continuous Delivery and how they can be applied to real-world scenarios as well as insights on some of the tooling that is available to facilitate automation.

Conventions

In this book, you will find a number of text styles that distinguish between different kinds of information. Here are some examples of these styles and an explanation of their meaning.

Code words in text, database table names, folder names, filenames, file extensions, pathnames, dummy URLs, user input, and Twitter handles are shown as follows: "These services are then bound to the lbvserver entity."

Any command-line input or output is written as follows:

ansible-playbook  -I inevntories/openstack.py  -l qa  -e environment=qa  -e current_build=9 playbooks/add_hosts_to_netscaler.yml

New terms and important words are shown in bold. Words that you see on the screen, for example, in menus or dialog boxes, appear in the text like this: "Click the Search button on Google."

Note

Warnings or important notes appear in a box like this.

Tip

Tips and tricks appear like this.

Reader feedback

Feedback from our readers is always welcome. Let us know what you think about this book—what you liked or disliked. Reader feedback is important for us as it helps us develop titles that you will really get the most out of.

To send us general feedback, simply e-mail , and mention the book's title in the subject of your message. If there is a topic that you have expertise in and you are interested in either writing or contributing to a book, see our author guide at www.packtpub.com/authors.

Customer support

Now that you are the proud owner of a Packt book, we have a number of things to help you to get the most from your purchase.

Downloading the color images of this book

We also provide you with a PDF file that has color images of the screenshots/diagrams used in this book. The color images will help you better understand the changes in the output. You can download this file from http://www.packtpub.com/sites/default/files/downloads/DevOpsforNetworking_ColorImages.pdf.

Errata

Although we have taken every care to ensure the accuracy of our content, mistakes do happen. If you find a mistake in one of our books—maybe a mistake in the text or the code—we would be grateful if you could report this to us. By doing so, you can save other readers from frustration and help us improve subsequent versions of this book. If you find any errata, please report them by visiting http://www.packtpub.com/submit-errata, selecting your book, clicking on the Errata Submission Form link, and entering the details of your errata. Once your errata are verified, your submission will be accepted and the errata will be uploaded to our website or added to any list of existing errata under the Errata section of that title.

To view the previously submitted errata, go to https://www.packtpub.com/books/content/support and enter the name of the book in the search field. The required information will appear under the Errata section.

Piracy

Piracy of copyrighted material on the Internet is an ongoing problem across all media. At Packt, we take the protection of our copyright and licenses very seriously. If you come across any illegal copies of our works in any form on the Internet, please provide us with the location address or website name immediately so that we can pursue a remedy.

Please contact us at with a link to the suspected pirated material.

We appreciate your help in protecting our authors and our ability to bring you valuable content.

Questions

If you have a problem with any aspect of this book, you can contact us at , and we will do our best to address the problem.