Book Image

Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture - Second Edition

By : Tom Hombergs
4 (1)
Book Image

Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture - Second Edition

4 (1)
By: Tom Hombergs

Overview of this book

Building for maintainability is key to keep development costs low (and developers happy). The second edition of "Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture" is here to equip you with the essential skills and knowledge to build maintainable software. Building upon the success of the first edition, this comprehensive guide explores the drawbacks of conventional layered architecture and highlights the advantages of domain-centric styles such as Robert C. Martin's Clean Architecture and Alistair Cockburn's Hexagonal Architecture. Then, the book dives into hands-on chapters that show you how to manifest a Hexagonal Architecture in actual code. You'll learn in detail about different mapping strategies between the layers of a Hexagonal Architecture and see how to assemble the architecture elements into an application. The later chapters demonstrate how to enforce architecture boundaries, what shortcuts produce what types of technical debt, and how, sometimes, it is a good idea to willingly take on those debts. By the end of this second edition, you'll be armed with a deep understanding of the Hexagonal Architecture style and be ready to create maintainable web applications that save money and time. Whether you're a seasoned developer or a newcomer to the field, "Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture" will empower you to take your software architecture skills to new heights and build applications that stand the test of time.
Table of Contents (18 chapters)

How does this help me build maintainable software?

The Hexagonal Architecture style cleanly separates domain logic and outward-facing adapters. This helps us to define a clear testing strategy that covers the central domain logic with unit tests and the adapters with integration tests.

The input and output ports provide very visible mocking points in tests. For each port, we can decide to mock it or use the real implementation. If the ports are each very small and focused, mocking them is a breeze instead of a chore. The fewer methods a port interface provides, the less confusion there is about which of the methods we have to mock in a test.

If it becomes too much of a burden to mock things away, or if we don’t know which kind of test we should use to cover a certain part of the code base, that's a warning sign. In this regard, our tests have the additional responsibility of being a canary – to warn us about flaws in the architecture and steer us back on the...