Book Image

Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture

By : Tom Hombergs
Book Image

Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture

By: Tom Hombergs

Overview of this book

Building for maintainability is key to keeping development costs low and processes easy. The second edition of Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture is here to equip you with the essential skills and knowledge to build maintainable software. With this comprehensive guide, you’ll explore the drawbacks of conventional layered architecture and the advantages of domain-centric styles such as Robert C. Martin's Clean Architecture and Alistair Cockburn's Hexagonal Architecture. Then, you’ll dive into hands-on explanations on how to convert hexagonal architecture into actual code. You'll learn in detail about different mapping strategies between the layers of hexagonal architecture and discover how to assemble the architectural elements into an application. Additionally, you’ll understand how to enforce architecture boundaries, which shortcuts produce what types of technical debt, and how, sometimes, it is a good idea to willingly take on those debts. By the end of this second edition, you'll be armed with a deep understanding of the hexagonal architecture style and be ready to create maintainable web applications that save money and time.
Table of Contents (13 chapters)

How Does This Help Me Build Maintainable Software?

The Hexagonal Architecture style cleanly separates domain logic and outward-facing adapters. This helps us to define a clear testing strategy that covers the central domain logic with unit tests and the adapters with integration tests.

The input and output ports provide very visible mocking points in tests. For each port, we can decide to mock it or to use the real implementation. If the ports are each very small and focused, mocking them is a breeze instead of a chore. The fewer methods a port interface provides, the less confusion there is about which of the methods we have to mock in a test.

If it becomes too much of a burden to mock things away or if we don't know what kind of test we should use to cover a certain part of the code base, it's a warning sign. In this regard, our tests have the additional responsibility of acting as a canary – to warn us about flaws in the architecture and to steer us back on the path to...