The "Kill Chain" approach to penetration testing

In 2009, Mike Cloppert of Lockheed Martin CERT introduced the concept that is now known as the "attacker kill chain." This includes the steps taken by an adversary when they are attacking a network. It does not always proceed in a linear flow as some steps may occur in parallel. Multiple attacks may be launched over time at the same target, and overlapping stages may occur at the same time.

In this book, we have modified the Cloppert's kill chain to more accurately reflect on how attackers apply these steps when exploiting networks and data services. The following diagram shows a typical kill chain of an attacker:

The "Kill Chain" approach to penetration testing

A typical kill chain of an attacker can be described as follows:

Reconnaissance phase – The adage, "reconnaissance time is never wasted time", adopted by most military organizations acknowledges that it is better to learn as much as possible about an enemy before engaging them. For the same reason, attackers will conduct extensive reconnaissance of a target before attacking. In fact, it is estimated that at least 70 percent of the "work effort" of a penetration test or an attack is spent conducting reconnaissance! Generally, they will employ two types of reconnaissance:
- Passive reconnaissance – This does not directly interact with the target in a hostile manner. For example, the attacker will review the publicly available website(s), assess online media (especially social media sites), and attempt to determine the "attack surface" of the target.
  One particular task will be to generate a list of past and current employee names. These names will form the basis of attempts to brute force, or guessing passwords. They will also be used in social engineering attacks.
  This type of reconnaissance is difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish from the behavior of regular users.
- Active reconnaissance – This can be detected by the target but, it can be difficult to distinguish most online organizations' faces from the regular backgrounds.
  Activities occurring during active reconnaissance include physical visits to target premises, port scanning, and remote vulnerability scanning.
The delivery phase – Delivery is the selection and development of the weapon that will be used to complete the exploit during the attack. The exact weapon chosen will depend on the attacker's intent as well as the route of delivery (for example, across the network, via wireless, or through a web-based service). The impact of the delivery phase will be examined in the second half of this book.
The exploit or compromise phase – This is the point when a particular exploit is successfully applied, allowing attackers to reach their objective. The compromise may have occurred in a single phase (for example, a known operating system vulnerability was exploited using a buffer overflow), or it may have been a multiphase compromise (for example, an attacker physically accessed premises to steal a corporate phone book. The names were used to create lists for brute force attacks against a portal logon. In addition, e-mails were sent to all employees to click on an embedded link to download a crafted PDF file that compromised their computers.). Multiphase attacks are the norm when a malicious attacker targets a specific enterprise.
Post exploit: action on the objective – This is frequently, and incorrectly, referred to as the "exfiltration phase" because there is a focus on perceiving attacks solely as a route to steal sensitive data (such as login information, personal information, and financial information); it is common for an attacker to have a different objective. For example, a business may wish to cause a denial of service in their competitor's network to drive customers to their own website. Therefore, this phase must focus on the many possible actions of an attacker.
One of the most common exploit activity occurs when, the attackers attempt to improve their access privileges to the highest possible level (vertical escalation), and to compromise as many accounts as possible (horizontal escalation).
Post exploit: persistence – If there is value in compromising a network or system, then that value can likely be increased if there is persistent access. This allows attackers to maintain communications with a compromised system. From a defender's point of view, this is the part of the kill chain that is usually the easiest to detect.

Kill chains are metamodels of an attacker's behavior when they attempt to compromise a network or a particular data system. As a metamodel, it can incorporate any proprietary or commercial penetration testing methodology. Unlike the methodologies, however, it ensures a strategic-level focus on how an attacker approaches the network. This focus on the attacker's activities will guide the layout and content of this book.

Tech Concepts

Programming languages

Tech Tools

Unlimited access to the largest independent learning library in tech of over 8,000 expert-authored tech books and videos.

Innovative learning tools, including AI book assistants, code context explainers, and text-to-speech.

50+ new titles added per month and exclusive early access to books as they are being written.

Mastering Kali Linux for Advanced Penetration Testing

By : Robert Beggs

Mastering Kali Linux for Advanced Penetration Testing

By: Robert Beggs

Overview of this book

The "Kill Chain" approach to penetration testing

Mastering Kali Linux for Advanced Penetration Testing

By : Robert Beggs

Mastering Kali Linux for Advanced Penetration Testing

By: Robert Beggs

Overview of this book

The "Kill Chain" approach to penetration testing

Confirmation

Buy this book with your credits?

Submit Your Feedback

Create a Free Account To Continue Reading

Sign in to activate your 7-day free access