If you've used Microsoft Virtual Server or Virtual PC, and then moved to Hyper-V, I'm almost sure that your first impression was: "Wow, this is much faster than Virtual Server". You are right. And there is a reason why Hyper-V performance is much better than Virtual Server or Virtual PC. It's all about the architecture.
There are two types of Hypervisor architectures. Hypervisor Type 1, like Hyper-V and ESXi from VMware, and Hypervisor Type 2, like Virtual Server, Virtual PC, VMware Workstation, and others. The objective of the Hypervisor is to execute, manage and control the operation of the VM on a given hardware. For that reason, the Hypervisor is also called Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM). The main difference between these Hypervisor types is the way they operate on the host machine and its operating systems. As Hyper-V is a Type 1 Hypervisor, we will cover Type 2 first, so we can detail Type 1 and its benefits later.
Hypervisor Type 2, also known as hosted, is an implementation of the Hypervisor over and above the OS installed on the host machine. With that, the OS will impose some limitations to the Hypervisor to operate, and these limitations are going to reflect on the performance of the VM.
To understand that, let me explain how a process is placed on the processor: the processor has what we call Rings on which the processes are placed, based on prioritization. The main Rings are 0 and 3. Kernel processes are placed on Ring 0 as they are vital to the OS. Application processes are placed on Ring 3, and, as a result, they will have less priority when compared to Ring 0. The issue on Hypervisors Type 2 is that it will be considered an application, and will run on Ring 3. Let's have a look at it:
As you can see from the preceding diagram, the hypervisor has an additional layer to access the hardware. Now, let's compare it with Hypervisor Type 1:
The impact is immediate. As you can see, Hypervisor Type 1 has total control of the underlying hardware. In fact, when you enable Virtualization Assistance (hardware-assisted virtualization) at the server BIOS, you are enabling what we call Ring -1, or Ring decompression, on the processor and the Hypervisor will run on this Ring.
The question you might have is "And what about the host OS?" If you install the Hyper-V role on a Windows Server for the first time, you may note that after installation, the server will restart. But, if you're really paying attention, you will note that the server will actually reboot twice. This behavior is expected, and the reason it will happen is because the OS is not only installing and enabling Hyper-V bits, but also changing its architecture to the Type 1 Hypervisor. In this mode, the host OS will operate in the same way a VM does, on top of the Hypervisor, but on what we call parent partition. The parent partition will play a key role as the boot partition and in supporting the child partitions, or guest OS, where the VMs are running. The main reason for this partition model is the key attribute of a Hypervisor: isolation.
Note
For Microsoft Hyper-V Server you don't have to install the Hyper-V role, as it will be installed when you install the OS, so you won't be able to see the server booting twice.
With isolation, you can ensure that a given VM will never have access to another VM. That means that if you have a compromised VM, with isolation, the VM will never infect another VM or the host OS. The only way a VM can access another VM is through the network, like all other devices in your network. Actually, the same is true for the host OS. This is one of the reasons why you need an antivirus for the host and the VMs, but this will be discussed later.
The major difference between Type 1 and Type 2 now is that kernel processes from both host OS and VM OS will run on Ring 0. Application processes from both host OS and VM OS will run on Ring 3. However, there is one piece left. The question now is: "What about device drivers?"