The growing number of use cases for blockchain, as well as an increasing awareness of its limitations, has given rise to a variety of successful blockchain implementations. In this section, we'll be trying to grasp the essence of each one of them.

The blockchain concept has been widely used and adapted due to its transparency and how every node participates in contributing to the growth of the blockchain. The early blockchain model, the product of Bitcoin, is completely open and permissionless and is popularly known as a public blockchain. Public blockchains are popular due to the impartial way in which the nodes are treated.

Public blockchains work seamlessly in trustless networks due to the immutable nature of the records. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and several other projects that have inherited PoW-like consensus algorithms ensure that recorded transactions are non-editable.

Public blockchains are ideal for cryptocurrency projects where recorded transactions should not be modified. However, public blockchains often face scalability issues at some point if the necessary changes aren't implemented. One of the most visible issues of Bitcoin is its mining approach (PoW), which is very expensive in terms of the electricity required for miners to solve the puzzle. The average time for block creation is 10 minutes. Therefore, the difficulty level of mining has been adjusted to maintain this time. This has resulted in a very expensive PoW environment due to competition among miners. We'll not be able to predict the future of Bitcoin or any other public blockchain due to these complex attributes, and only the natural evolution of the technology can decide its fate.

Due to these pros and cons, the permissionless or public blockchain is well suited for transparent applications, where the blockchain should inherently secure the system since the network is trustless.

Private blockchains were introduced mostly to widen the scope of blockchain technology. The permissioned blockchain, as the name suggests, uses the opposite approach to that of the public blockchain. Private blockchains came about mainly to solve some of the issues we saw in public blockchains and to make blockchain technology scalable.

Permissioned blockchains introduce access control to provide specific access to the participants in a network. Each permissioned blockchain will have an administrator who assigns roles for the participants in the network. Permissioned blockchains ensure that bad actors are not a part of the validation or block-creation processes and thus eliminate any potential attacks on the blockchain. A network involving a permissioned blockchain is mostly a trusted network.

Private blockchains are suitable for organizations where a ledger only needs to be shared internally. Permissioned blockchains are often mutable or not strictly immutable, and their transactions can be modified with some effort; this is in stark contrast to public blockchains, where this is nearly impossible. Permissioned blockchains are still decentralized ledgers, but they will have some nodes with limited capability within the organization, whereas nodes in public blockchains are treated impartially.

The consortium blockchain is a hybrid blockchain that is semi-decentralized. It combines the best features of both permissionless and permissioned blockchains. Instead of assigning most tasks to a single organization, a consortium blockchain assigns the same tasks to nodes maintained by multiple organizations. Instead of having a single validator node, there can be multiple nodes. Although a consortium blockchain is permissioned, it's more decentralized than a private blockchain.