Tuples are lightweight, structural types. To be precise, they are types made up of other types, joined together within parentheses in a particular order, separated by commas, and without field names. The tuple value syntax is very simple–open parenthesis, comma-separated list of values, close parenthesis. In fact, the value syntax closely mimics the type of the tuples themselves.
Why would we use tuples when we have record types with field names? Sometimes, we don't want to spin up a new type, with a definition, just to hold some values together. Tuples are a low-ceremony way to do that. But the danger of using them over larger portions of a codebase is that they're not self-describing like record types are. Here's an example:
/* src/Ch04/Ch04_Tuples...