Book Image

Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture - Second Edition

By : Tom Hombergs
4 (1)
Book Image

Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture - Second Edition

4 (1)
By: Tom Hombergs

Overview of this book

Building for maintainability is key to keep development costs low (and developers happy). The second edition of "Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture" is here to equip you with the essential skills and knowledge to build maintainable software. Building upon the success of the first edition, this comprehensive guide explores the drawbacks of conventional layered architecture and highlights the advantages of domain-centric styles such as Robert C. Martin's Clean Architecture and Alistair Cockburn's Hexagonal Architecture. Then, the book dives into hands-on chapters that show you how to manifest a Hexagonal Architecture in actual code. You'll learn in detail about different mapping strategies between the layers of a Hexagonal Architecture and see how to assemble the architecture elements into an application. The later chapters demonstrate how to enforce architecture boundaries, what shortcuts produce what types of technical debt, and how, sometimes, it is a good idea to willingly take on those debts. By the end of this second edition, you'll be armed with a deep understanding of the Hexagonal Architecture style and be ready to create maintainable web applications that save money and time. Whether you're a seasoned developer or a newcomer to the field, "Get Your Hands Dirty on Clean Architecture" will empower you to take your software architecture skills to new heights and build applications that stand the test of time.
Table of Contents (18 chapters)

When to use which mapping strategy?

This is the million-dollar question, isn’t it?

The answer is the usual, dissatisfying it depends.

Since each mapping strategy has different advantages and disadvantages, we should resist the urge to define a single strategy as a hard-and-fast global rule for the whole code base. This goes against our instincts, as it feels untidy to mix patterns within the same code base. But knowingly choosing a pattern that is not the best pattern for a certain job, just to serve our sense of tidiness, is irresponsible, plain and simple.

Also, as software evolves over time, the strategy that was the best for the job yesterday might not still be the best for the job today. Instead of starting with a fixed mapping strategy and keeping it over time – no matter what – we might start with a simple strategy that allows us to quickly evolve the code and later move to a more complex one that helps us to better decouple the layers.

In order...