Book Image

Mastering Embedded Linux Programming

By : Chris Simmonds
Book Image

Mastering Embedded Linux Programming

By: Chris Simmonds

Overview of this book

Mastering Embedded Linux Programming takes you through the product cycle and gives you an in-depth description of the components and options that are available at each stage. You will begin by learning about toolchains, bootloaders, the Linux kernel, and how to configure a root filesystem to create a basic working device. You will then learn how to use the two most commonly used build systems, Buildroot and Yocto, to speed up and simplify the development process. Building on this solid base, the next section considers how to make best use of raw NAND/NOR flash memory and managed flash eMMC chips, including mechanisms for increasing the lifetime of the devices and to perform reliable in-field updates. Next, you need to consider what techniques are best suited to writing applications for your device. We will then see how functions are split between processes and the usage of POSIX threads, which have a big impact on the responsiveness and performance of the final device The closing sections look at the techniques available to developers for profiling and tracing applications and kernel code using perf and ftrace.
Table of Contents (16 chapters)
15
Index

Summary

Every Linux device needs an init program of some kind. If you are designing a system which only has to launch a small number of daemons at startup and remains fairly static after that, then BusyBox init is sufficient for your needs. It is usually a good choice if you are using Buildroot as the build system.

If, on the other hand, you have a system that has complex dependencies between services at boot time or runtime, and you have the storage space, then systemd would be the best choice. Even without the complexity, systemd has some useful features in the way it handles watchdogs, remote logging, and so on, so you should certainly give it a serious thought.

It is hard to make a case for System V init on its own merits, since it has few advantages over the simple BusyBox init. It will live on for a long time nevertheless, just because it is there. For example, if you are building using the Yocto Project and you decide against systemd then System V init is the alternative.

In terms of...