Book Image

Interpretable Machine Learning with Python - Second Edition

By : Serg Masís
4 (4)
Book Image

Interpretable Machine Learning with Python - Second Edition

4 (4)
By: Serg Masís

Overview of this book

Interpretable Machine Learning with Python, Second Edition, brings to light the key concepts of interpreting machine learning models by analyzing real-world data, providing you with a wide range of skills and tools to decipher the results of even the most complex models. Build your interpretability toolkit with several use cases, from flight delay prediction to waste classification to COMPAS risk assessment scores. This book is full of useful techniques, introducing them to the right use case. Learn traditional methods, such as feature importance and partial dependence plots to integrated gradients for NLP interpretations and gradient-based attribution methods, such as saliency maps. In addition to the step-by-step code, you’ll get hands-on with tuning models and training data for interpretability by reducing complexity, mitigating bias, placing guardrails, and enhancing reliability. By the end of the book, you’ll be confident in tackling interpretability challenges with black-box models using tabular, language, image, and time series data.
Table of Contents (17 chapters)
15
Other Books You May Enjoy
16
Index

Mission accomplished

This chapter’s mission was to see whether there was unfair bias in predicting whether a particular defendant would recidivate. We demonstrated that the FPR for African American defendants is 1.87 times higher than for Caucasian defendants. This disparity was confirmed with WIT, indicating that the model in question is much more likely to misclassify the positive class based on race. However, this is a global interpretation method, so it doesn’t answer our question regarding a specific defendant. Incidentally, in Chapter 11, Bias Mitigation and Causal Inference Methods, we will cover other global interpretation methods for unfairness.

To ascertain whether the model was racially biased against the defendant in question, we leveraged anchor and counterfactual explanations – they both output race as a primary feature in their explanations. The anchor did it with relatively high precision and coverage, and Counterfactuals Guided by Prototypes...