Book Image

Java Coding Problems - Second Edition

By : Anghel Leonard
Book Image

Java Coding Problems - Second Edition

By: Anghel Leonard

Overview of this book

The super-fast evolution of the JDK between versions 12 and 21 has made the learning curve of modern Java steeper, and increased the time needed to learn it. This book will make your learning journey quicker and increase your willingness to try Java’s new features by explaining the correct practices and decisions related to complexity, performance, readability, and more. Java Coding Problems takes you through Java’s latest features but doesn’t always advocate the use of new solutions — instead, it focuses on revealing the trade-offs involved in deciding what the best solution is for a certain problem. There are more than two hundred brand new and carefully selected problems in this second edition, chosen to highlight and cover the core everyday challenges of a Java programmer. Apart from providing a comprehensive compendium of problem solutions based on real-world examples, this book will also give you the confidence to answer questions relating to matching particular streams and methods to various problems. By the end of this book you will have gained a strong understanding of Java’s new features and have the confidence to develop and choose the right solutions to your problems.
Table of Contents (16 chapters)
1
Text Blocks, Locales, Numbers, and Math
Free Chapter
2
Objects, Immutability, Switch Expressions, and Pattern Matching
14
Other Books You May Enjoy
15
Index

55. Taking on the hard way to discover equals()

Check out the following code:

Integer x1 = 14; Integer y1 = 14;
Integer x2 = 129; Integer y2 = 129;
List<Integer> listOfInt1 = new ArrayList<>(
 Arrays.asList(x1, y1, x2, y2));
listOfInt1.removeIf(t -> t == x1 || t == x2);
List<Integer> listOfInt2 = new ArrayList<>(
 Arrays.asList(x1, y1, x2, y2));
listOfInt2.removeIf(t -> t.equals(x1) || t.equals(x2));

So, initially, listOfInt1 and listOfInt2 have the same items, [x1=14, y1=14, x2=129, y2=129]. But, what will contain listOfInt1/listOfInt2 after executing the code based on removeIf() and ==, respectively equals()?

The first list will remain with a single item, [129]. When t is x1, we know that x1 == x1, so 14 is removed. But, why is x2 removed? When t is y1, we know that y1 == x1 should be false since, via ==, we compare the object’s references in memory, not their values. Obviously, y1 and x1 should have different references in the memory… or shouldn’t they ? Actually, Java has an internal rule to cache integers in -127 … 128. Since x1=14 is cached, y1=14 uses the cache so no new Integer is created. This is why y1 == x1 and y1 is removed as well. Next, t is x2, and x2 == x2, so x2 is removed. Finally, t is y2, but y2 == x2 returns false, since 129 > 128 is not cached, so x2 and y2 have different references in memory.

On the other hand, when we use equals(), which is the recommended approach for comparing the object’s values, the resulting list is empty. When t is x1, x1 =x1, so 14 is removed. When t is y1, y1 =x1, so y1 is removed as well. Next, t is x2, and x2= x2, so x2 is removed. Finally, t is y2, and y2 =x2, so y2 is removed as well.